What would you do if your child was not thriving in his or her school environment? What if you could use the money your state sets aside for him or her to tailor a better educational fit? Education Savings Accounts may provide the flexibility of choice for parents facing this dilemma. What exactly are they and how do they work?


View the Executive Summary for this brief.

Policy Circle co-founder, Kathy Hubbard, was joined by John Kirtley from the American Federation for Children and guest editor, Jill Turgeon, to discuss Education Savings Accounts.  Listen to the 30 minute call below.


What is an Education Savings Account?

Education Savings Accounts, also known as “ESAs,” enable parents to “withdraw their children from public district or charter schools and receive a deposit of public funds into government-authorized savings accounts with restricted, but multiple, uses.” The accounts operate much like a debit card that parents can use to purchase approved educational services for their children, such as private school tuition, private tutoring fees, community college costs and other customized learning services. EdChoice explains (1 min):


The Education Savings Accounts discussed in this brief are different from the Education Savings Accounts such as the Coverdell, which are set up by a bank to work like a 529 and are funded through personal funds, not state tax dollars. ESAs are also different from vouchers, which are funds for tuition payments at an educational institution other than the traditional public school. Unlike with vouchers, parents can use ESA money on any approved educational expense. It can be used simultaneously for multiple learning options, such as private tutoring, occupational therapy, and schooling supplies.

Why it Matters

According to the National Center for Education Statistics, the number of students ages 3-21 who received special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act has averaged between 13% and 14% of all public school students since 2000. In the 2019-2020 school year, there were 7.3 million public school students receiving services. Of those, one-third have specific learning disabilities. Having choices in educational services allows all children to receive a customized education experience that can meet their individual learning needs, thereby preparing them for the future.


Putting it in Context


For years, the state of Arizona pursued alternative options to traditional local public schooling. In addition to many smaller local initiatives such as open enrollment policies and charter/magnet schools, the state adopted two small pilot voucher programs in 2006. Arizona courts later ruled these programs to be unconstitutional; because the vouchers allowed parents to send their children to private schools, including religious schools, using state money, it was seen as a transfer of state funds to religious institutions.

The state legislature then passed Lexie’s Law, a corporately-funded tax credit scholarship program to help fund private school scholarships for children with disabilities. Under this legislation, corporations and insurance companies may claim a tax-credit for donations to private charities that award scholarships to children who are eligible for these voucher programs. However, this program proved difficult to fund. In 2011, Arizona lawmakers passed the nation’s first law establishing ESAs, called the Arizona Empowerment Scholarship Account program. The program was challenged in court, and in 2014 the Arizona Supreme Court ruled that ESAs were not in violation of the constitution.

Eight states – Arizona, Florida, Indiana, Mississippi, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Tennessee, and West Virginia – have ESA programs. Nevada’s program is not in operation due to litigation. As of 2022, just over 30,000 K-12 students in the U.S. were recipients of ESAs. Below is a general timeline of how ESAs developed:

Arizona: 2011 “Empowerment Scholarship Account”

  • The first state to enact an education savings account program
  • For students with special needs and circumstances, such as foster children, children with parents on active military duty, and children living on Native American reservations
  • An attempt to expand the program to make all K-12 students eligible to apply for an ESA was defeated in a 2018 referendum

Florida: 2014 “Gardiner Scholarship Program”

  • Created for students with special needs
  • Parents can use the funds to pay for a variety of educational services, including private school tuition, tutoring, online education, home education, curriculum, therapy, postsecondary educational institutions in Florida and other defined educational services

Mississippi: 2015 “Equal Opportunity for Students with Special Needs Program”

  • Allows Mississippi students with special needs to receive a portion of their public funding in a government-authorized savings account with multiple uses

Tennessee: 2015 “Individualized Education Account”

  • Gives parents of students with special needs access to an Individualized Education Account (IEA)
  • An IEA can be used for a variety of educational expenses, including private school tuition, private tutoring, learning therapies and more
  • In May 2020, a county judge ruled the program was unconstitutional and that Tennessee had “improperly imposed the program” on Davidson and Shelby counties, home to Nashville and Memphis

Nevada: 2016 “Education Savings Account Program”

  • The nation’s first universal ESA program
  • Allows parents to remove their children from their assigned public schools and access a portion or all of their children’s public education funding to pay for services like private school tuition, curriculum, learning therapies, tutoring, and more
  • In 2016 following two lawsuits, the Nevada Supreme Court upheld the ESA program but not its funding mechanism, meaning the state legislature must create a new funding legislation. In 2017, a standoff in the state legislature resulted in a funding bill dying and funding previously earmarked for the ESA being transferred back into the public education fund, with a portion allocated to a tax credit scholarship

North Carolina: 2017 “Personal Education Savings Account”

  • Enacted in 2017 to begin providing funding to students in the 2018–19 school year
  • Serves some students with special needs and can be used in conjunction with the state’s two voucher programs
  • Provides families funds to pay for a variety of educational services

New Hampshire: 2021 “Education Freedom Account Program”

  • Enacted and launched in 2021
  • Allows students in low- and middle-income households to receive education savings accounts to be used for private school tuition, tutoring, books, educational therapies and other education-related services

Indiana: 2021 “Education Scholarship Account Program”

  • Enacted in 2021 to launch in Fall of 2022
  • May be used for private school tuition as well as educational services such as testing fees, special needs services and therapies, individual classes and school-sponsored extracurricular activities, and occupational therapy
  • Limited to students with special needs from families earning up to 300% of the federal free and reduced-price lunch program

West Virginia: 2021 “Hope Scholarship Program”

  • Enacted in 2021 to launch in Fall of 2022
  • Allows eligible parents to receive the average per-pupil state funding already set aside for their children’s education into a separate, parent-controlled fund
  • Funds can be used for private school tuition, tutoring, education-related therapies, transportation, and other education-related services.


How ESAs Work

Each state has its own set of guidelines to determine which students are eligible for ESAs and how much funding students receive. Similarly, each jurisdiction has its own way of administering the program, including determining which services are eligible to be purchased with ESA funds and whether the state or a third-party company will administer the program. However, the programs generally operate in a similar manner.

Public schools are funded through a combination of local, state, and federal resources. The U.S. Department of Education states it contributes roughly 8% of the elementary and secondary education budget, with state and local governments funding the remaining 92%. Specific state allocations can be found here.


ESAs are funded based upon the state’s average “per pupil funding.” This figure is derived from taking the operational budget of a school system and dividing it by the total number of students the system serves, but not all states do it exactly the same. For example, Arizona and Nevada give 90% of the total per pupil revenue (federal, state, and local) that would otherwise go to the public school to the ESA program. The final 10% of funds for that student are used to cover administrative costs associated with the program’s oversight. In Tennessee, ESA funding is based only on state and local funding, not federal.

The ESA funds are placed into an account for use by parents to pay for educational expenses such as tuition for a private school, supplies such as textbooks or technology expenses, private tutoring, or specialized educational or therapeutic services based on the needs of the student. These expenses are audited by the servicing entity (a contracted third party, as is the case in Florida, or the state, as is the case in Arizona) to ensure that the funds are being used properly. Most states allow unused funds to be rolled over for later educational expenses such as college tuition. To ensure that there is no double funding, students enrolled in an ESA program are not allowed to concurrently attend public school.

The fact that ESA funds come from taxpayer money is a main concern for many opposed to ESAs. Since one use for ESA funds is for private schools, and this includes religious schools, it would mean taxpayer funds are being used for religious schools, which runs “counter to state and federal principles of separation of church and state.” The July 2020 Supreme Court ruling in Espinoza v Montana Department of Revenue, however, found that “the state of Montana cannot exclude religious schools from receiving tax credit-funded scholarships under its school choice program.” This ruling could mean that other states would not be allowed to exclude religious schools in their school choice programs. For more on this case, see the National Council of State Legislatures’ explanation.

Those who oppose ESAs also often cite the concern that funding for ESAs is diverting already scarce resources away from public schools and the students who remain enrolled there. For example, the federal government’s Impact Aid Program (part of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965) provides financial assistance “to local school districts with concentrations of children residing on Indian lands, military bases, low-rent housing properties, or other Federal properties,” which means they operate with less local revenue than other school districts because Federal property is exempt from local property taxes. The National Coalition for Public Education argues this aid allows schools to coordinate “comprehensive systems of support for students, and professional development for school personnel,” and ESAs could drain these funds.

Whether this is true is still to be determined since few states have had their ESA programs implemented for long periods of time, and there is a “lack of requirements in the laws for program evaluations or for states to collect the data needed for a serious study.” In Arizona, however, families for non-special needs students received an average funding of just over $6,000 in 2019, approximately $4,000 less than Arizona’s public school average per pupil spending. In fact, for fiscal year 2020, Arizona’s budget includes “an explicit subsidy for the public school system using ESA program savings,” with approximately $3 million going to updating the Department of Education’s IT system.

At the same time, this relatively small amount of funding has some questioning whether it is enough for all families to provide their children with educational options; for the 2021-2022 school year, the average private school tuition in Arizona is just over $10,000, with the elementary school average about $9,700 and the high school average just over $15,000 . “For a lower-income family with few additional resources to supplement this amount, choices will be limited – particularly once transportation issues are taken into account,” argues one National Education Policy Center report.


Each state determines the specific eligibility requirements for their respective ESA program. The primary benefactors of ESAs have been students with special needs, as well as students with challenging circumstances, such as children in military families (who tend to move frequently) and those who are in foster care. There are some states that have proposed a model of universal eligibility, where any student would have access to ESA funds, but they have faced legal challenges in doing so. Two examples are Nevada and Arizona. In 2016 Nevada passed a bill that provided this universal expansion of eligibility, but it was rescinded in 2017 due to a political standoff that has since left the state’s program in limbo. Arizona’s attempt to expand the program to make all K-12 students eligible to apply for an ESA was defeated in a 2018 referendum.

Since local public schools are part of the fabric of a community, this often leads to a community desire to protect local public schools and the concern that if more students have access to ESAs, more students will leave the public school system which could result in a drain of resources from public schools. As mentioned previously, studies attesting to this are limited.

Additionally, some school funding is determined by the Census data of how many children live within a certain district, so overall funding to public schools should not be seriously affected by a small portion of students choosing not to attend public schools; it may even mean that there are more funds per pupil available in the public school.

Two factors are metrics to determine ESAs’ success: parental satisfaction and academic progress. In a 2016 parent survey conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics, data showed that parents were more satisfied with educational options of choice, as opposed to traditional public schools of assignment. Only 54% of parents whose child attended a public school of assignment were satisfied with the school, as opposed to 77% who had children attending a private school.

Even if universal eligibility was a factor, many states also set enrollment caps to limit the number of students who can enroll in ESA programs. This means that while the pool of eligible students is larger, the number of students accepted would not increase, so there would not be a drastic drain on public schools. At the same time, enrollment caps with an expanded applicant pool also raises concerns about which students are accepted. ESAs were originally created to give expanded options to students with special learning needs. If all students are allowed to apply for ESAs, there may be tension between deciding whether to prioritize students with special learning needs or ensuring all students have equal access and opportunity to apply.


Audits ensure ESA funds are not being misused, and each state does these differently. In Florida and Mississippi, “parents or guardians must justify costs when asking for fund reimbursement.” Arizona and Tennessee “distribute funds directly to a bank account on a quarterly basis and monitor transactions with random audits” (Education Commission of the States). How timely and effective these audits are in managing the programs and preventing fraud is unclear. The Arizona Office of the Auditor General’s review of the state’s ESA program found over $100,000 in misused funds between August 2015 and January 2016, including parents who did not submit required expense reports and parents who purchased items that were not eligible for ESA funds. A 2019 audit of Florida’s ESA program by the Florida Auditor General found that Step Up Inc., the third party in charge of administering the ESA program, did not always properly evaluate applicants and spent $280,000 in program funds on expenses not related to the program.

Fraud and misuse of funds are not unique to ESA programs; audits of public schools from around the country have revealed misuse of public funds due to “poor record keeping” and “accounting practices that misclassified expenditures.” And within ESA programs, calls for “much more stringent monitoring…to safeguard the proper use of public funds” have been effective. After a series of recommendations undertaken by the program staff at Arizona’s Department of Education, a follow-up audit found that in over 168,000 transactions between October 2018 and October 2019, there was “only one successful transaction at an unapproved merchant totaling $30.” Additionally, the audit found the program was understaffed; while this could have contributed to even more accounts of misused funds never being reported, it also contributed to poor customer service that left many families confused as to what services and expenditures were eligible.

Measuring Success

A major factor in determining the success of ESAs is academic progress. Traditional public schools use tools such as standardized tests to determine academic success, and, “given that school choice programs rely on public funds, there is a fair argument that taxpayers deserve assurance that students are progressing academically” with an ESA program. Curriculum requirements and teacher qualifications are not factors considered in determining what educational expenses ESA funds can be used for. In some states, parents must submit data on their children’s academic progress, but assessments are not standardized, and therefore difficult to measure.

It should be noted that students with special needs typically use alternative assessments, so the requirement of typical standardized tests would be inappropriate for a majority of students using ESAs. If legislation is included to utilize academic progress as a metric of success, careful steps should be taken to ensure that the assessment used to determine this progress fairly reflects the students’ abilities.  For example, in the case of special needs students, the same alternative assessments that are used in the traditional public schools should also be used when assessing students utilizing the ESAs. That said, not everyone agrees that academic progress should be used to determine if ESAs are successful.

Another important factor to consider is satisfaction. If parents are pleased with their decisions regarding their child’s education, and the child is learning and living well thanks to the chosen educational environment, then on that personal level the ESA was put to good use. If children are not making academic progress, then parents can choose a different option for their children.

Ivan Carrasco was a shy child who was a victim of bullying at his elementary school. He also struggled in reading and got poor grades, which added to his frustrations. His mother Jeanet’s efforts to meet with school leadership to address her concerns about her son were unsuccessful. Using Arizona’s Empowerment Scholarship Accounts, she was able to enroll her son in a private school. He entered fourth grade reading at a second-grade level, and by the time he was in the seventh grade, he was reading at an eighth grade level. 

 See examples of two more students who benefited from ESAs (8 min):


ESAs are only one of the many school choice options available for families looking outside of public schooling options, including vouchers, tax-credit scholarships, charter schools, and private school choice programs. Take a look at EdChoice’s Interactive Map to see what options exist in your state.

The Education Freedom Scholarships and Opportunity Act would create an annual federal tax credit for businesses and individuals that donate to scholarship granting organizations. In exchange for these donations (for which there would be a cap), contributors receive “a nonrefundable, dollar-for-dollar tax credit; meaning their income taxes would be reduced by the amount they donate.” This structure means no taxpayer is forced to contribute, nor are organizations or states forced to participate.

Each individual state that chooses to participate – rather than the federal government – would be in charge of identifying eligible SGOs and determining which education expenses are approved and which students are eligible. Funds would pay for K-12 education options such as private school tuition, private tutoring, Advanced Placement courses, online classes and educational technology, career and technical education or internships and apprenticeships, day care or after-school programs, instructional materials for home education, and special education services for students with unique learning needs. As with ESAs, the main concerns with EFS are that it will drain resources from public schools and, because only public schools need to adhere to the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, students with special learning needs could be overlooked.

In the short term, EFS has been considered as a means of providing emergency assistance to students and their families as Americans across the country deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. The SGOs could provide families with direct education assistance to find the best education options for their children, as well as “help private schools survive coronavirus, and present an influx of students into public schools that may already be struggling with oversize classrooms.”

Some argue this is necessary because many parents have lost jobs, which makes it more difficult to afford education alternatives to public schools. The strain on teachers is another factor. Others argue this would undermine public schools because public schools have been facing budget cuts and a lack of guidance, and that they would be able to provide better services and safe in-person learning with more resources.


Preparing children to be productive members of society begins with education. A challenge set before families, communities, job creators and educators is how to ensure all children, regardless of backgrounds, life situations, and abilities, have the best possible education. This will allow them to succeed as active contributors to the economy and society at large.

Ways to Get Involved/What You Can Do

Measure: Find out what your state and district are doing about education options.

Identify: Who are the influencers in your state, county, or community? Learn about their priorities and consider how to contact them, including elected officials, boards of education, city councils, journalists, media outlets, community organizations, and local businesses.

  • Who are the members of boards of education in your state? Who is on your district’s school board?
  • What steps have  your state’s/community’s elected/appointed official taken?
  • Who are the local organizations or groups that are involved in education reform near you?

Reach out: You are a catalyst. Finding a common cause is a great opportunity to develop relationships with people who may be outside of your immediate network. All it takes is a small team of two or three people to set a path for real improvement.

  • Find allies in your community or in nearby towns and elsewhere in the state.
  • Foster collaborative relationships with community organizations and school boards.

Plan: Set some milestones based on your state’s legislative calendar.

  • Don’t hesitate to contact The Policy Circle team, communications@thepolicycircle.org, for connections to the broader network, advice, insights on how to build rapport with policy makers and establish yourself as a civic leader.

Execute: Give it your best shot. You can:

  • Set up a meeting with your state representatives to discuss their views and understandings of ESAs, or attend school board meetings to ask questions, find out about priorities, and review annual budgets.
  • Meet with a family who chooses private or charter schools as an option for educating their children, and ask their views.
  • Volunteer at your child’s school to learn about teachers’ views, how the school runs, and how decisions are made.

Working with others, you may create something great for your community. Here are some tools to learn how to contact your representatives and write an op-ed.


Thought Leaders and Resources


American Federation for Children

National Education Association

National Association of State Boards of Education

Ballotpedia.org – School Boards & Elections

The Policy Circle team thanks Jill Turgeon, a Policy Circle member in Virginia, for her substantial contribution to creating this primer, and for her passion for promoting better education for all.